I do WAY more demanding things with PCs, and for a living. I’ve owned dozens upon dozens of computers at this point, and I use them for professional content creation that is very demanding and requires extremely stable and low-latency performance. Not to sound defensive, but just for a bit of context - I’ve been building, testing, and using workstation computers since the early 90s and have worked in computer hardware and software design and development for decades, including working closely with Intel, Microsoft, and others. But with a recent update (I think), the problem is back and makes it so that I’m restarting the Roon app on the server a couple times a day at least. I had this problem a long time ago and it was fixed (can’t remmber exactly but I thought it was via a new build). When I had 8GB installed it would eventually use almost ALL available RAM. Restarting the app, everything goes back to normal using about 1.7 - 2.0 GB of RAM, but over about 12 hours or so it will increase to over 7GB or more and just keeps rising until I restart it. I just restarted the Roon app on the server as it had reached nearly 9GB of RAM usage just sitting idle. I upgraded from 8GB to 32GB to rule out not having enough RAM but instead it just keeps using more and more of the available memory. Number of Tracks in LibraryĪs the Roon server is running it will slowly use more and more RAM, eventually leading to Roon app becoming a white screen and remotes experiencing slowness and dropouts. Remotes use Roland UA-1610, various Google Home speakers, phones, iPad, etc. Server is connected to Denon x3700H via HDMI. Remotes use 5G wireless Connected Audio Devices Server and Library both use Ethernet connection to TP-Link AX11000 router, AT&T 1GB Fiber Library: QNAP TS-451 with 8TB RAID5 Networking Gear & Setup Details So I don't know what you are looking at, but it isn't any of those things I'm sure.Server: NUC8i3BEH with Windows 11 and 32GB RAM and 256GB SSD We deal with questions directly pertaining to that often enough that we'd know this just from that alone, without even factoring in any advanced usage of those utilities, which most of us also have. They all pretty much show baseline frequency. HWinfo, HWmonitor, Open hardware monitor and mostly all the rest all show ACTUAL memory frequency, not the double data rate frequency, and if you have a need to argue with that I'd suggest looking at the monitoring utilities which are in common use before doing so. System information doesn't show memory speed either. It shows capacity and usage, as well as the commit charge and hard faults. To begin with, "Resource monitor" doesn't even show memory speed. Practically ALL monitoring utilities show the memory frequency in this way, so I think perhaps you might want to take another look at the topic if you have any desire to be factually accurate. Besides which, it's not even a mistake that it shows that way, it's intentional. And if you think Windows resource monitor, or task monitor, or any of the built in utilities, are consistently, or even mostly, accurate, then you have a different view of things than the majority of us do. If they are in any other slots and you have only two modules, then they are installed incorrectly.Ĭlick to expand.No, I'm not. The fourth slot is the one closest to the edge of the motherboard. Also, if you are running a two DIMM configuration, make sure they are installed in the second and fourth slots over from the CPU socket. I would download and install HWinfo, then boot into Windows safe mode, open HWinfo, choose the "sensors only" option and uncheck the "summary" option, scroll down to the memory section and take a screenshot (And post it) of that screen. Not always, to be sure, but often enough when I've seen that it's been because there is an issue. When you see "8GB hardware reserved" that often means there is a problem with one or more sticks. Most important here IS the fact that there seems to be an issue with the memory. Since we don't actually KNOW what the memory speed is SUPPOSED to be, because we lack the model or even the advertised speed of the memory kit, we can only guess that it's actually running at the speed it's supposed to be but performance would certainly be at least moderately improved with something in the 2933-3200mhz range. That is the base frequency, which is how resource monitor (And many other monitoring utilities) sees it, but since it is DDR, double data rate, it is ACTUALLY operating at twice that, or 2133mhz, which is STILL somewhat slow for a second gen Ryzen system. The memory is not running at 1067mhz on a Ryzen system. It is either Windows defender or another antimalware service. Click to expand.Antimalware service executable is exactly what it sounds like.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |